1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
- Provide a framework for studies
- Take a stance
- Format
- Tell us if it meets the rule of 3 criteria.
- Tell why it does or why it doesn't
- It follows rule 1, 2, and 3 in the fact that it does allow the individual to do in depth research on the topic to achieve a final answer. It allows the person to choose a point and argue it backing it up with the research
- The formatting of this question is weird. It doesn't give any clue or stance as to what they're trying to figure out. They're not looking for anything.
- This follows all three rules. Although it could be a bit more clear on what aspects of hairstyle creation they will be exploring. The formatting of the question is very good.
- The question seems very single answer. It does not allow for extra research and several good answers.
3. Based on your review of the rule of 3 and your experience with assessing four EQs, please write another draft EQ for your senior project.
- What are the most important factors a First Tech Challenge team should consider in order to win a competition?
No comments:
Post a Comment